Advertisement

businessHealth Care

Texas restrictions on emergency abortions stand after U.S. Supreme Court review

The Biden Administration asked justices to throw out a lower court order.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday let stand a decision barring emergency abortions that violate the law in Texas, which has one of the country’s strictest abortion bans.

Without detailing their reasoning, the justices kept in place a lower court order that said hospitals cannot be required to provide pregnancy terminations that would violate Texas law.

The Biden administration had asked the justices to throw out the lower court order, arguing that hospitals have to perform abortions in emergency situations under federal law. The administration pointed to the Supreme Court’s action in a similar case from Idaho earlier this year in which the justices narrowly allowed emergency abortions to resume while a lawsuit continues.

Advertisement
Business Briefing

Become a business insider with the latest news.

Or with:

The administration also cited a Texas Supreme Court ruling that said doctors do not have to wait until a woman’s life is in immediate danger to provide an abortion legally. The administration said it brings Texas in line with federal law and means the lower court ruling is not necessary.

Texas asked the justices to leave the order in place, saying the state Supreme Court ruling meant Texas law, unlike Idaho’s, does have an exception for the health of a pregnant patient and there’s no conflict between federal and state law.

Advertisement

Doctors have said the law remains dangerously vague after a medical board refused to specify exactly which conditions qualify for the exception.

There has been a spike in complaints that pregnant women in medical distress have been turned away from emergency rooms in Texas and elsewhere as hospitals grapple with whether standard care could violate strict laws against abortion.

Pregnancy terminations have long been part of medical treatment for patients with serious complications, as way to to prevent sepsis, organ failure and other major problems. But in Texas and other states with strict abortion bans, doctors and hospitals have said it is not clear whether those terminations could run afoul of abortion bans that carry the possibility of prison time.

Advertisement

The Texas case started after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, leading to abortion restrictions in many Republican-controlled states. The Biden administration issued guidance saying hospitals still needed to provide abortions in emergency situations under a health care law that requires most hospitals to treat any patients in medical distress.

Texas sued over that guidance, arguing that hospitals cannot be required to provide abortions that would violate its ban. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court Appeals sided with the state, ruling in January that the administration had overstepped its authority.

Related Stories
Read More
Readers respond to the cost of maintaining roads in Texas.
Letters to the Editor — Road costs, maternal deaths in Texas, media bias, goodness
Readers say we don’t pay enough for our roads; would like data on maternal deaths in Texas; respond to a letter about DMN bias; and appreciate those stories that remind us goodness still exists
In this file photo, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton was seen giving remarks to republican...
Why Paxton’s abortion lawsuit against NY doctor may be one salvo in a long war
The lawsuit is meant to “test the waters” of what is legally permissible against medical providers who help Texans get abortions.
The Instagram logo is seen on a cellphone in Boston in 2022. Readers warn of the dangers of...
Letters to the Editor — Social media, Ken Paxton and women, Battery X unit, AT&T Stadium
Readers warn of the dangers of social media; wonder why Ken Paxton is so obsessed with women’s health care; admire the Battery X unit; and discuss the possible name change for AT&T Stadium.